<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sailor - Soldier - Marine - Airman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.navycs.com/blogs/2008/07/12/sailor-soldier-marine-airman/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.navycs.com/blogs/2008/07/12/sailor-soldier-marine-airman</link>
	<description>Navy Blog containing the musings of a retired Navy Master Chief</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ouch</title>
		<link>http://www.navycs.com/blogs/2008/07/12/sailor-soldier-marine-airman#comment-701</link>
		<dc:creator>Ouch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 01:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.navycs.com/blogs/?p=141#comment-701</guid>
		<description>@Floyd - I will always in my articles and correspondence Sailor, Airman, Guardsman, Marine, Soldier. Those in service of our country have earned my respect and will continue to receive it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Floyd - I will always in my articles and correspondence Sailor, Airman, Guardsman, Marine, Soldier. Those in service of our country have earned my respect and will continue to receive it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sofwildbill</title>
		<link>http://www.navycs.com/blogs/2008/07/12/sailor-soldier-marine-airman#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>sofwildbill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.navycs.com/blogs/?p=141#comment-534</guid>
		<description>The term "Marine" has been a proper noun for some time, much to the consternation of many counterparts.

Personally, I think if you strap on the uniform, you should be exempt from taxes.

But I am an extreme patriot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The term &#8220;Marine&#8221; has been a proper noun for some time, much to the consternation of many counterparts.</p>
<p>Personally, I think if you strap on the uniform, you should be exempt from taxes.</p>
<p>But I am an extreme patriot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Hudson</title>
		<link>http://www.navycs.com/blogs/2008/07/12/sailor-soldier-marine-airman#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Hudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.navycs.com/blogs/?p=141#comment-496</guid>
		<description>The term "Family Member" was also declared a proper noun, when it is refering to a military family member. 

Floyd,
The reason we use "respect" nouns is not to determine the respect of an individual, but the respect of the service. However, these are not grammar guidelines but "style" guidelines. There are many style books out there. Journalists use the AP Style book, while academicians usually use the MLB or Chicago Style books. The military has their own style book, which is why you see a big difference between military writing regarding ranks compared to civilian journalists. 

The use of Sailor, Airman, Guardsman, Marine, Soldier as a proper noun instead of a common noun is just one more example of this style difference. It creates a significant, but subtle, change in how we are addressing the group of people. There is nothing wrong with with showing our respect to those individuals (as a collective) by offering them a captial letter.

The Podcast Patriot (www.podcastpatriot.com)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The term &#8220;Family Member&#8221; was also declared a proper noun, when it is refering to a military family member. </p>
<p>Floyd,<br />
The reason we use &#8220;respect&#8221; nouns is not to determine the respect of an individual, but the respect of the service. However, these are not grammar guidelines but &#8220;style&#8221; guidelines. There are many style books out there. Journalists use the AP Style book, while academicians usually use the MLB or Chicago Style books. The military has their own style book, which is why you see a big difference between military writing regarding ranks compared to civilian journalists. </p>
<p>The use of Sailor, Airman, Guardsman, Marine, Soldier as a proper noun instead of a common noun is just one more example of this style difference. It creates a significant, but subtle, change in how we are addressing the group of people. There is nothing wrong with with showing our respect to those individuals (as a collective) by offering them a captial letter.</p>
<p>The Podcast Patriot (www.podcastpatriot.com)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Floyd Gondolli</title>
		<link>http://www.navycs.com/blogs/2008/07/12/sailor-soldier-marine-airman#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Floyd Gondolli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.navycs.com/blogs/?p=141#comment-492</guid>
		<description>Ha!  This is one rich article.  

Please, ol' boy, enlighten me...what's a "respect" noun?  Not every sailor, solider, marine, airman, etc. deserves your respect just because of their chosen profession.  Need I remind you that respect must be EARNED before it is rendered?

"Tell them [English teachers] they need to follow the lead of their respective military service heads and update their grammar manuals" 

Oh, man.  Please tell me you aren't serious about this?  Military leaders are now in the business of setting trends in proper English?  That notion is as laughable as it is absurd.  I sincerely hope you are joking, but something tells me you're dead serious...

Just in case you are joking, lemme be the first to howl: Bwaahhahahahahaha!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha!  This is one rich article.  </p>
<p>Please, ol&#8217; boy, enlighten me&#8230;what&#8217;s a &#8220;respect&#8221; noun?  Not every sailor, solider, marine, airman, etc. deserves your respect just because of their chosen profession.  Need I remind you that respect must be EARNED before it is rendered?</p>
<p>&#8220;Tell them [English teachers] they need to follow the lead of their respective military service heads and update their grammar manuals&#8221; </p>
<p>Oh, man.  Please tell me you aren&#8217;t serious about this?  Military leaders are now in the business of setting trends in proper English?  That notion is as laughable as it is absurd.  I sincerely hope you are joking, but something tells me you&#8217;re dead serious&#8230;</p>
<p>Just in case you are joking, lemme be the first to howl: Bwaahhahahahahaha!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
